Columbus, 43229, OH,
United States
Ohio Department of Taxation Technographics
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by Ohio Department of Taxation and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 988 Ohio Department of Taxation employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that Ohio Department of Taxation has purchased the following applications: Oracle PeopleSoft ERP for ERP Financial in 2014, Oracle Taleo Cloud Service for Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System in 2020, IBM Workload Automation for Business Process Management in 2016 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems Ohio Department of Taxation is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with Oracle , IBM , Hyland or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing Ohio Department of Taxation revenues, which have grown to $276.0 million in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for Ohio Department of Taxation intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
ERP Financial Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | Legacy | Oracle PeopleSoft ERP | ERP Financial | ERP Financial Management | n/a | 2014 | 2014 |
|
HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | Legacy | Oracle Taleo Cloud Service | Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System | HCM | n/a | 2020 | 2020 |
|
ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Legacy | IBM Workload Automation | Business Process Management | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2016 | 2016 |
In 2016, the Ohio Department of Taxation deployed IBM Workload Automation to orchestrate automated batch processing across its production environment. IBM Workload Automation was implemented as a Business Process Management application to centralize scheduling, job dependencies, and execution timing for core processing pipelines.
The implementation focused on batch job scheduling and parameterized schedule packages, with configuration work to support symbolic parameters and environment promotion workflows. Functional capabilities implemented included automated job chaining, schedule revision controls, runtime verification of scheduling parameters, and non production system testing to validate packages before production execution.
Integrations and operational coverage included direct scheduling of STARS, Mainframe, and ECOMM job streams, and continued use of secure data transfer channels for exchanges with the IRS. Operational scope spanned ISD production operations, data systems schedulers, and customer coordination for specifications and delivery timelines, with weekly mainframe IPL cycles incorporated into schedule planning.
Governance and process changes emphasized maintaining records of job schedules and run completion dates, developing and retaining job flow documentation on shared drives, and providing training and work direction to lower level schedulers. Troubleshooting practices formalized interpretation of Job Control Language components and problem escalation procedures, while system testing in non production environments supported controlled rollouts of scheduling packages.
|
Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Content Management | Content Management |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||