AI Buyer Insights:

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

List of LegalBillReview Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
Cuzdey, Ehrmann, Stine & Sansalone Professional Services 25 $3M United States LegalBillReview LegalBillReview Legal Practice Management 2017 n/a
In 2017, Cuzdey, Ehrmann, Stine & Sansalone implemented LegalBillReview for Legal Practice Management to centralize invoice review and attorney billing workflows. The deployment targeted the firm's accounting and fee-earning functions within its Alpharetta, Georgia office, aligning the application with bookkeeping responsibilities that include coding to the general ledger and time slip processing. LegalBillReview was configured to support invoice intake and detailed bill review, including line level validation, rate and fee assessment, and coding to the firm chart of accounts. Configuration emphasized modules and capabilities typical of Legal Practice Management, such as accounts payable handling, time entry reconciliation for attorney billing, check processing and deposit workflows, and credit card reconciliation support. Operational coverage focused on the accounting assistant role and attorneys who interact with fee entries, with LegalBillReview orchestrating workflow routing from invoice receipt through coding and approval. The implementation included role-based access and approval queues to separate bill review, AP posting, and attorney time verification, improving governance around billing controls and auditability. Governance and process changes formalized invoice coding standards and approval handoffs, embedding LegalBillReview into the firm’s billing and AP procedures. The narrative reflects a targeted, small firm implementation of LegalBillReview as part of the Legal Practice Management stack to operationalize bookkeeping, accounts payable, and attorney billing processes.
McLain & Merritt Professional Services 50 $5M United States LegalBillReview LegalBillReview Legal Practice Management 2017 n/a
In 2017, McLain & Merritt implemented LegalBillReview as part of its Legal Practice Management tooling to centralize client billing and invoice review workflows. The deployment targeted firm billing operations for the firm, with configuration focused on supporting attorneys, paralegals, and billing administrators responsible for Workers Compensation defense matters. LegalBillReview was configured to manage invoice intake and line item review, support time entry compliance with individual client billing guidelines, and administer dispute case management for contested charges. Functional capabilities implemented included invoice entry and edit workflows, structured dispute and appeal handling, expense tracking for billable versus nonbillable items, and payment tracking tied to attorney and paralegal timekeeping practices. The implementation integrated with the firm s client e billing flows and established interoperable handoffs to multiple e billing platforms explicitly referenced by internal staff, including Juris, Serengeti, Orion, Tymetrix, Collaborati, CounselLink, Quovant, Legal Solutions Suite, Bottomline Legal X, and others. Governance changes emphasized standardized timekeeping and billing guidance, routable approval and appeal processes for disputed invoice entries, and role based access for attorneys, paralegals, and billing staff to manage uploads, reviews, and client specific billing rules.
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating LegalBillReview

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating LegalBillReview. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities.

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD LegalBillReview Coverage

LegalBillReview is a Legal Practice Management solution from LegalBillReview.

Companies worldwide use LegalBillReview, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as McLain & Merritt and Cuzdey, Ehrmann, Stine & Sansalone are recorded users of LegalBillReview for Legal Practice Management.

Companies using LegalBillReview are most concentrated in Professional Services, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using LegalBillReview are most concentrated in United States, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of LegalBillReview across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using LegalBillReview range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 100%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 0%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 0%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 0%.

Customers of LegalBillReview include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified LegalBillReview customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Legal Practice Management.