List of Amazon CodePipeline Customers
Seattle, 98109, WA,
United States
Since 2010, our global team of researchers has been studying Amazon CodePipeline customers around the world, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions and perhaps the rise and fall of certain vendors and their products on a quarterly basis.
Each quarter our research team identifies companies that have purchased Amazon CodePipeline for Robotic Process Automation from public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources, including the customer size, industry, location, implementation status, partner involvement, LOB Key Stakeholders and related IT decision-makers contact details.
Companies using Amazon CodePipeline for Robotic Process Automation include: Tenet Healthcare, a United States based Healthcare organisation with 74480 employees and revenues of $20.67 billion, Woodside Energy, a Australia based Oil, Gas and Chemicals organisation with 4718 employees and revenues of $8.58 billion and many others.
Contact us if you need a completed and verified list of companies using Amazon CodePipeline, including the breakdown by industry (21 Verticals), Geography (Region, Country, State, City), Company Size (Revenue, Employees, Asset) and related IT Decision Makers, Key Stakeholders, business and technology executives responsible for the software purchases.
The Amazon CodePipeline customer wins are being incorporated in our Enterprise Applications Buyer Insight and Technographics Customer Database which has over 100 data fields that detail company usage of software systems and their digital transformation initiatives. Apps Run The World wants to become your No. 1 technographic data source!
Apply Filters For Customers
| Logo | Customer | Industry | Empl. | Revenue | Country | Vendor | Application | Category | When | SI | Insight | Insight Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Tenet Healthcare | Healthcare | 74480 | $20.7B | United States | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Amazon CodePipeline | Robotic Process Automation | 2019 | n/a | In 2019 Tenet Healthcare implemented Amazon CodePipeline as its core CI/CD orchestration platform, Apps Category . The implementation was driven by an on-premises to cloud native operational posture for application delivery within Tenet Healthcare’s engineering teams, with an emphasis on pipeline automation and secure build promotion across environment-specific segregation. Amazon CodePipeline was used alongside Jenkins to orchestrate end-to-end build, test, and deploy workflows for containerized microservices. The deployment standardized pipeline modules for source retrieval, build and artifact staging, security scanning, and automated deployment to AWS EKS. Functional capabilities implemented included integration of GitHub for source control, Maven for Java build artifacts, SonarQube for code quality analysis, and artifact promotion into Docker images managed with Ansible and Docker tooling. Pipelines were configured to run static and dynamic security scans as part of DevSecOps practices, enabling continuous code checking for vulnerabilities and compliance. Integrations extended to runtime and observability tooling, with Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring and alerting, and Kubernetes orchestration in EKS for production workloads. Automation covered infrastructure provisioning and operational tasks, including scripted database provisioning and DNS record management with Python and shell scripting, and Helm for environment-specific deployments. The implemented Amazon CodePipeline workflows were designed to hand off built artifacts to Kubernetes deployment automation, linking CI artifacts to EKS-based deployment pipelines. Governance and operational controls emphasized SRE practices, including the adoption of Service Level Objective frameworks and error budgets to guide reliability decisions, and embedding security scanning into pipeline gates to meet federal compliance requirements. Outcomes called out in the implementation included a 30 percent reduction in vulnerabilities through DevSecOps practices, a 40 percent reduction in deployment time from pipeline automation with AWS Code Pipeline and Jenkins, and a 25 percent improvement in incident response time through automated monitoring and alerting. | |
 |
Woodside Energy | Oil, Gas and Chemicals | 4718 | $8.6B | Australia | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Amazon CodePipeline | Robotic Process Automation | 2019 | n/a | In 2019 Woodside Energy began revamping its DevOps toolchain, shifting continuous integration and infrastructure-as-code workloads toward cloud-native AWS services and implementing Amazon CodePipeline as a core orchestration layer. Apps Category: The implementation centered on using Amazon CodePipeline to orchestrate end-to-end pipelines that run integration tests, performance tests and other sequential or parallel stages, replacing a previously stitched together workflow that used TeamCity for builds and HashiCorp Terraform for deploys. Amazon CodePipeline was configured to coordinate AWS CodeBuild for build execution and to host multi-stage pipelines that reduce manual stitching and enable greater automation of testing and deployment workflows. Operational scope covered multiple internal teams that had previously shared a single TeamCity instance, which created build queue contention and opaque cost allocation across groups. Woodside executed a phased migration, leaving some components on TeamCity while moving others to CodeBuild and Amazon CodePipeline, avoiding a big-bang cutover and allowing gradual refactoring of pipeline definitions and environment provisioning flows. Governance and process changes included tighter pipeline orchestration and the introduction of cloud-native execution models to reduce hands-on server management for CI servers. Outcomes reported by Woodside include lower incremental build costs, noted as "we only pay while our build is running", reduced pipeline blockages, and easier automation, while engineers identified gaps such as harder versioning in CodeBuild and a partially manual rollback process in Amazon CodePipeline that require interim workarounds. |
Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating Amazon CodePipeline
Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications
| Logo | Company | Industry | Employees | Revenue | Country | Evaluated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||||