Redondo Beach, 90277, CA,
United States
Catalina Technology Technographics
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by Catalina Technology and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 10 Catalina Technology employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that Catalina Technology has purchased the following applications: Microsoft 365 for Collaboration in 2016, GoDaddy DNS for Domain Name System (DNS) in 2013, EVO Payments Nodus Payment Processing for Payment Processing in 2016 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems Catalina Technology is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with Microsoft , Salesforce , GoDaddy or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing Catalina Technology revenues, which have grown to $1.0 million in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for Catalina Technology intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
Collaboration
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
Insight Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Legacy | Microsoft 365 | Collaboration | Collaboration | n/a | 2016 | 2016 | ||
|
|
|
|
Collaboration | Collaboration |
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
|
IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
Insight Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoDaddy | Legacy | GoDaddy DNS | Domain Name System (DNS) | IaaS | n/a | 2013 | 2013 |
ERP Financial Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
Insight Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVO Payments | Legacy | EVO Payments Nodus Payment Processing | Payment Processing | ERP Financial Management | n/a | 2016 | 2016 | In 2016, Catalina Technology implemented EVO Payments Nodus Payment Processing. The deployment used Nodus PayFabric as the cloud payment integration to provide a single API layer in the Payment Processing category, addressing payments and finance needs for Dynamics SL and ecommerce customers in the United States. The EVO Payments Nodus Payment Processing implementation centered on PayFabric module usage described in the vendor case study, configuring a single API abstraction that expanded payment processor choices available to Catalina Technology customers. The single API layer reduced Catalina Technologys PCI scope by shifting payment handling to the cloud integration, and the case study explicitly links the PayFabric integration to improved deployment speed and greater processor flexibility for Catalinas software customers. Architecturally the integration placed PayFabric between Catalina Technologys Dynamics SL integrations and downstream acquirers, enabling Catalina Technology to provision multiple processor endpoints without embedding each processors interface in the application. Operational coverage was payments and finance workflows for Dynamics SL and ecommerce clients in the United States, with the implementation documented as a cloud payment integration in the vendor materials. Governance and rollout emphasized centralized payment orchestration through the PayFabric API layer, simplifying vendor choice and streamlining configuration for customer deployments. The vendor case study frames the implementation as improving deployment speed and processor flexibility while reducing PCI scope, outcomes cited in the source documentation. |
CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
Insight Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) | CyberSecurity |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||