Washington DC, 20350-1200, WA,
United States
US Navy Technographics
US Navy Technographics, Software Purchases, AI and Digital Transformation Initiatives
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by US Navy and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 387637 US Navy employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that US Navy has purchased the following applications: Oracle NetSuite ERP for ERP Financial in 2003, Fatigue FAST Avoidance Scheduling for Fatigue Management in 2004, Symphony Industrial APM 360 for Asset Performance Management in 2021 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems US Navy is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with Oracle , Fatigue Science , NetCom Learning or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing US Navy revenues, which have grown to $321.0 million in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for US Navy intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
US Navy Tech Stack and Enterprise Applications
US Navy ERP
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle | Legacy | Oracle NetSuite ERP | ERP Financial | ERP | n/a | 2003 | 2003 |
In 2003, US Navy implemented Oracle NetSuite ERP to support ERP Financial operations. The Oracle NetSuite ERP deployment concentrated on consolidating core finance and accounting processes including general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable and fixed asset accounting.
Configuration emphasized modular financial workflows typical of ERP Financial applications, including budgeting and budget controls, fund accounting, multi-entity consolidation and financial reporting. Implementation included enterprise chart of accounts standardization and role based access controls to align with public sector audit and compliance requirements. Oracle NetSuite ERP was positioned to host centralized transaction processing and month end close orchestration.
The implementation targeted finance and accounting business functions within the organization, encompassing transaction processing, ledger close, budgeting and asset management. Operational scope focused on accounting teams and centralized financial operations, with configuration geared toward high volume transaction throughput and structured approval workflows.
Governance focused on establishing standardized approval chains, audit trails and segregation of duties controls embedded in the application, and on workflow automation for invoice routing and period close tasks. This configuration reflects an enterprise scale ERP Financial deployment by US Navy, Oracle NetSuite ERP supporting finance and accounting functions.
|
US Navy HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue Science | Legacy | Fatigue FAST Avoidance Scheduling | Fatigue Management | HCM | n/a | 2004 | 2006 |
In 2004 the US Navy implemented Fatigue FAST Avoidance Scheduling. The Fatigue FAST Avoidance Scheduling application was introduced into the United States Navy School of Aviation Safety and subsequently mandated by the Naval Safety Center as a Fatigue Management tool for aviation safety and scheduling, positioning it for use by flight surgeons and safety investigators within naval aviation operations. Functionally the implementation focused on structured analysis of 72 hour and 14 day sleep and duty histories, avoidance scheduling recommendations, and case support for mishap investigations. The implementation improved investigators' ability to identify fatigue related factors in mishaps, and the Fatigue FAST Avoidance Scheduling application was incorporated into naval aviation training and operational safety processes by 2006 under governance requirements from the Naval Safety Center, with standardized use by flight surgeons and aviation safety personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
Learning and Development | HCM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
US Navy ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symphony Industrial AI | Legacy | Symphony Industrial APM 360 | Asset Performance Management | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2021 | 2021 |
In 2021, US Navy implemented Symphony Industrial APM 360. The deployment positioned Symphony Industrial APM 360 as the core Asset Performance Management platform to support condition-based maintenance and asset reliability within the Navy's aerospace and defense operations.
Functional modules configured included predictive analytics for remaining useful life estimation, real-time condition monitoring and alarming, asset health scoring and risk-based prioritization, and prescriptive maintenance workflows that feed work planning and execution. The solution was provisioned with visualization dashboards and analytics to surface failure modes and support reliability engineering decisions, using standard data ingestion and analytics layering consistent with Asset Performance Management use cases.
Governance changes accompanied the rollout, instituting standardized asset health metrics, condition-based maintenance governance, and workflow orchestration between maintenance planning and engineering teams. Operational ownership was aligned with maintenance and reliability functions across relevant Navy organizations, and the implementation focused on embedding APM workflows into existing maintenance and engineering processes.
|
|
|
|
|
Business Process Management | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Management | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
US Navy AI Development
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
AI Model Deployment and Monitoring | AI Development |
|
2022 | 2024 |
|
US Navy Analytics and BI
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
US Navy Collaboration
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration | Collaboration |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
US Navy Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Content Management | Content Management |
|
2009 | 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Document Management | Content Management |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Web Content Management | Content Management |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
US Navy SCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Supply Chain Management | SCM |
|
2025 | 2025 |
|
US Navy CRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
PR and Media Communication | CRM |
|
2023 | 2023 |
|
US Navy ITSM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Remote Monitoring and Management | ITSM |
|
2001 | 2001 |
|
US Navy Procurement
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Supplier Risk Management | Procurement |
|
2023 | 2023 |
|
US Navy PaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service) | PaaS |
|
2017 | 2018 |
|
US Navy IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Servers, Storage and Networking | IaaS |
|
2010 | 2010 |
|
US Navy CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Identity and Access Management (IAM) | CyberSecurity |
|
2022 | 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) | CyberSecurity |
|
2009 | 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vulnerability Management , Application Security (AppSec) | CyberSecurity |
|
2015 | 2016 |
|
US Navy Physical Security
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Video Security Cameras | Physical Security |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
US Navy Professional Services
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
PEO (Professional Employer Organization) | Professional Services |
|
2018 | 2019 |
|
IT Decision Makers and Key Stakeholders at US Navy
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
Apps Being Evaluated by US Navy Executives
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||