List of Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Customers
Bedford, 1730, MA,
United States
Since 2010, our global team of researchers has been studying Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) customers around the world, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions and perhaps the rise and fall of certain vendors and their products on a quarterly basis.
Each quarter our research team identifies companies that have purchased Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) for Process Simulation from public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources, including the customer size, industry, location, implementation status, partner involvement, LOB Key Stakeholders and related IT decision-makers contact details.
Companies using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) for Process Simulation include: LG Chem, a South Korea based Oil, Gas and Chemicals organisation with 18750 employees and revenues of $36.22 billion, Tupras, a Turkey based Oil, Gas and Chemicals organisation with 6208 employees and revenues of $19.30 billion, Petrofac, a United Kingdom based Utilities organisation with 3900 employees and revenues of $2.50 billion and many others.
Contact us if you need a completed and verified list of companies using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR), including the breakdown by industry (21 Verticals), Geography (Region, Country, State, City), Company Size (Revenue, Employees, Asset) and related IT Decision Makers, Key Stakeholders, business and technology executives responsible for the software purchases.
The Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) customer wins are being incorporated in our Enterprise Applications Buyer Insight and Technographics Customer Database which has over 100 data fields that detail company usage of software systems and their digital transformation initiatives. Apps Run The World wants to become your No. 1 technographic data source!
Apply Filters For Customers
| Logo | Customer | Industry | Empl. | Revenue | Country | Vendor | Application | Category | When | SI | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
LG Chem | Oil, Gas and Chemicals | 18750 | $36.2B | South Korea | AspenTech | Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) | Process Simulation | 2015 | n/a |
In 2015, LG Chem implemented Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as part of a targeted plant revamp at its Yeosu 1,3-butadiene facility, supporting Process Engineering efforts to rerate heat exchange equipment and reconfigure heat integration. The deployment was explicitly aligned with a broader AspenTech toolset, leveraging Aspen Plus and Aspen Energy Analyzer alongside Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) to evaluate thermal networks and equipment performance.
The Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) implementation focused on exchanger rating and thermal performance modules, enabling detailed heat transfer calculations, size and duty verification, and scenario-based rerating workflows. Configuration work emphasized equipment-level data capture and iterative simulation runs to identify chokepoints in the plant heat-exchange network and to model alternative heat-integration layouts consistent with Process Engineering practice.
Integrations were realized between Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating, Aspen Plus process models, and Aspen Energy Analyzer energy assessments, creating a data flow from process simulation into exchanger rating inputs and back into plant-wide energy optimization use cases. Operational scope was concentrated on the Yeosu 1,3-butadiene plant and involved process engineering and operations teams to validate rerating results against field data and to prioritize revamp actions.
Governance centered on engineering-led scenario analysis and equipment rerating approval workflows, with changes implemented as part of a bulk-chemicals process revamp. Outcomes reported in the engagement included an approximate 15 percent increase in plant capacity and significant energy savings, with Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating used specifically to rate exchangers and to identify the revamp opportunity within the Process Engineering program.
|
|
|
Petrofac | Utilities | 3900 | $2.5B | United Kingdom | AspenTech | Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) | Process Simulation | 2013 | n/a |
In 2013, Petrofac implemented Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR). The deployment integrated Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as Activated EDR models within Aspen HYSYS flowsheets, Apps Category .
Implementation centered on rigorous heat-exchanger design and rating capabilities, using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) to size and evaluate exchangers and provide detailed thermal and hydraulic calculations. Activated EDR models were configured to run inside process simulations so exchanger performance could drive flowsheet iterations and engineering-level validation. These functional capabilities were consumed by EPC process engineering teams during the revamp design cycle.
The Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) integration with Aspen HYSYS tied detailed exchanger models into steady state process flowsheets for a gas-production revamp within Petrofac's Middle East workstreams. Operational coverage focused on process engineering and plant debottlenecking activities to align design outcomes with capacity requirements. The engagement was executed as an EPC process-engineering assignment rather than an enterprise-wide IT program.
The AspenTech case study explicitly credits Activated EDR within Aspen HYSYS for enabling Petrofac to debottleneck the plant to meet a 20% capacity increase while reducing CAPEX by about 25%. The implementation highlights close coupling of exchanger rating, thermal-hydraulic modeling, and flowsheet-level integration to support engineering decisions and capital planning for the revamp project.
|
|
|
Tupras | Oil, Gas and Chemicals | 6208 | $19.3B | Turkey | AspenTech | Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) | Process Simulation | 2015 | n/a |
In 2015 Tupras deployed Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as an Exchanger Design and Rating solution to standardize heat exchanger rating and design activities across its refining operations. The deployment targeted processor-led engineering workflows supporting hydrocracker, steam-methane reformer, mild hydrocracker, and hydrodesulphurization units at Tupras sites where heat-exchanger performance and fouling monitoring were operational priorities.
Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) was configured to support core functional capabilities including detailed thermal rating, fouling monitoring and trending, and exchanger sizing checks used in routine operations and project evaluations. The implementation fed exchanger performance data into energy recovery and minimization studies, and was used alongside flowsheet simulation outputs to validate thermal designs and perform hydraulic checks relevant to exchanger selection and maintenance planning.
Integration workstreams explicitly linked EDR outputs with ASPEN-HYSYS and PRO-II flowsheet models for consistent process conditions and performance validation, enabling iterative rating and design cycles between process simulation and exchanger calculation. These integrations supported feasibility studies and operational tuning, with model exchanges used by process engineers to reconcile flowsheet scenarios and exchanger performance under varying feed and duty conditions.
Operational governance centered on process engineering and process superintendent roles, with EDR embedded into both operational monitoring and project workflows for energy and hydrocarbon margin studies. The tool was used as a technical authority for rating and fouling monitoring, informing project feasibility and operational adjustment decisions without replacing any specifically named prior product.
|
Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR)
- University of Brescia, a Italy based Education organization with 500 Employees
- Saipem, a Italy based Oil, Gas and Chemicals company with 32033 Employees
Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications
| Logo | Company | Industry | Employees | Revenue | Country | Evaluated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||||