AI Buyer Insights:

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

List of Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
LG Chem Oil, Gas and Chemicals 18750 $36.2B South Korea AspenTech Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Process Simulation 2015 n/a
In 2015, LG Chem implemented Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as part of a targeted plant revamp at its Yeosu 1,3-butadiene facility, supporting Process Engineering efforts to rerate heat exchange equipment and reconfigure heat integration. The deployment was explicitly aligned with a broader AspenTech toolset, leveraging Aspen Plus and Aspen Energy Analyzer alongside Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) to evaluate thermal networks and equipment performance. The Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) implementation focused on exchanger rating and thermal performance modules, enabling detailed heat transfer calculations, size and duty verification, and scenario-based rerating workflows. Configuration work emphasized equipment-level data capture and iterative simulation runs to identify chokepoints in the plant heat-exchange network and to model alternative heat-integration layouts consistent with Process Engineering practice. Integrations were realized between Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating, Aspen Plus process models, and Aspen Energy Analyzer energy assessments, creating a data flow from process simulation into exchanger rating inputs and back into plant-wide energy optimization use cases. Operational scope was concentrated on the Yeosu 1,3-butadiene plant and involved process engineering and operations teams to validate rerating results against field data and to prioritize revamp actions. Governance centered on engineering-led scenario analysis and equipment rerating approval workflows, with changes implemented as part of a bulk-chemicals process revamp. Outcomes reported in the engagement included an approximate 15 percent increase in plant capacity and significant energy savings, with Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating used specifically to rate exchangers and to identify the revamp opportunity within the Process Engineering program.
Petrofac Utilities 3900 $2.5B United Kingdom AspenTech Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Process Simulation 2013 n/a
In 2013, Petrofac implemented Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR). The deployment integrated Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as Activated EDR models within Aspen HYSYS flowsheets, Apps Category . Implementation centered on rigorous heat-exchanger design and rating capabilities, using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) to size and evaluate exchangers and provide detailed thermal and hydraulic calculations. Activated EDR models were configured to run inside process simulations so exchanger performance could drive flowsheet iterations and engineering-level validation. These functional capabilities were consumed by EPC process engineering teams during the revamp design cycle. The Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) integration with Aspen HYSYS tied detailed exchanger models into steady state process flowsheets for a gas-production revamp within Petrofac's Middle East workstreams. Operational coverage focused on process engineering and plant debottlenecking activities to align design outcomes with capacity requirements. The engagement was executed as an EPC process-engineering assignment rather than an enterprise-wide IT program. The AspenTech case study explicitly credits Activated EDR within Aspen HYSYS for enabling Petrofac to debottleneck the plant to meet a 20% capacity increase while reducing CAPEX by about 25%. The implementation highlights close coupling of exchanger rating, thermal-hydraulic modeling, and flowsheet-level integration to support engineering decisions and capital planning for the revamp project.
Tupras Oil, Gas and Chemicals 6208 $19.3B Turkey AspenTech Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Process Simulation 2015 n/a
In 2015 Tupras deployed Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) as an Exchanger Design and Rating solution to standardize heat exchanger rating and design activities across its refining operations. The deployment targeted processor-led engineering workflows supporting hydrocracker, steam-methane reformer, mild hydrocracker, and hydrodesulphurization units at Tupras sites where heat-exchanger performance and fouling monitoring were operational priorities. Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) was configured to support core functional capabilities including detailed thermal rating, fouling monitoring and trending, and exchanger sizing checks used in routine operations and project evaluations. The implementation fed exchanger performance data into energy recovery and minimization studies, and was used alongside flowsheet simulation outputs to validate thermal designs and perform hydraulic checks relevant to exchanger selection and maintenance planning. Integration workstreams explicitly linked EDR outputs with ASPEN-HYSYS and PRO-II flowsheet models for consistent process conditions and performance validation, enabling iterative rating and design cycles between process simulation and exchanger calculation. These integrations supported feasibility studies and operational tuning, with model exchanges used by process engineers to reconcile flowsheet scenarios and exchanger performance under varying feed and duty conditions. Operational governance centered on process engineering and process superintendent roles, with EDR embedded into both operational monitoring and project workflows for energy and hydrocarbon margin studies. The tool was used as a technical authority for rating and fouling monitoring, informing project feasibility and operational adjustment decisions without replacing any specifically named prior product.
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR)

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR). Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities. Companies Actively Evaluating Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) for Process Simulation include:

  1. University of Brescia, a Italy based Education organization with 500 Employees
  2. Saipem, a Italy based Oil, Gas and Chemicals company with 32033 Employees

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) Coverage

Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) is a Process Simulation solution from AspenTech.

Companies worldwide use Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR), from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as LG Chem, Tupras and Petrofac are recorded users of Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) for Process Simulation.

Companies using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) are most concentrated in Oil, Gas and Chemicals and Utilities, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) are most concentrated in South Korea, Turkey and United Kingdom, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 0%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 0%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 66.67%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 33.33%.

Customers of Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified Aspen Exchanger Design and Rating (EDR) customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Process Simulation.