Moline, 61265, IL,
United States
John Deere Technographics
John Deere Technographics, Software Purchases, AI and Digital Transformation Initiatives
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by John Deere and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 73100 John Deere employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that John Deere has purchased the following applications: Exela Lockbox for AR Automation in 2017, SAP HCM Benefits for Benefits Administration in 2013, SAP Vehicle Management System (VMS) for Automotive ERP in 2015 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems John Deere is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with Exela Technologies , SAP , Microsoft or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing John Deere revenues, which have grown to $44.67 billion in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for John Deere intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
John Deere Tech Stack and Enterprise Applications
ERP Financial Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exela Technologies | Legacy | Exela Lockbox | AR Automation | ERP Financial Management | n/a | 2017 | 2017 |
In 2017, John Deere implemented Exela Lockbox for AR Automation, deploying the Exela Lockbox application to support accounts receivable and cash application workflows within John Deere Financial. The initial deployment centralized lockbox handling and remittance processing under Exela Technologies operations to streamline receivables intake across bank channels.
The Exela Lockbox implementation incorporated AR Automation capabilities typical for lockbox services, including remittance capture, lockbox imaging, automated cash application, and exception workflow management to route and resolve payment discrepancies. Configuration and operational design emphasized workflow instruction documentation and cross training to maintain continuity and knowledge transfer among processing staff.
Operational delivery was managed across two Exela sites with a Service Delivery Manager assigned to John Deere Financial who supervised 11 individuals, handled hiring and performance reviews, executed corrective actions, and coordinated absences to sustain processing capacity. Day to day operations involved collaboration with John Deere Financial departments and remote support to align procedures, financial trends, and budget planning with on site processing activities.
Governance for the Exela Lockbox service included daily service level agreement monitoring and recording, quarterly reviews presenting statistical performance and recommended process changes, succession planning and annual goal setting, plus contract renewal planning and execution. Exela Lockbox functioned as an outsourced AR Automation service for John Deere, combining technical remittance processing with structured operational governance and workforce management.
|
|
|
|
|
ERP Financial | ERP Financial Management |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
ERP Financial | ERP Financial Management |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
ERP Financial | ERP Financial Management |
|
2018 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Management | ERP Financial Management |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Management | ERP Financial Management |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | Legacy | SAP HCM Benefits | Benefits Administration | HCM | n/a | 2013 | 2013 |
In 2013 John Deere implemented SAP HCM Benefits as its Benefits Administration solution, undertaking a focused redesign of SAP delivered benefits functionality to align with John Deere business processes. The engagement centered on rebuilding custom SAP Benefits and Open Enrollment processing, with SAP HCM Benefits configured as the core application to manage plan definitions, eligibility determination, and enrollment cycles across employee populations.
The implementation work included detailed configuration of benefit plan catalogs, eligibility rules, enrollment event handling, and open enrollment workflows, combined with customizations to support John Deere specific rules and data models. SAP HCM Benefits was extended to encapsulate benefits administration workflows and user-facing enrollment processing, while maintaining the SAP HCM data model and human resources master data as the authoritative source for employee records.
Governance and process restructuring accompanied the technical changes, with redesigned enrollment approval paths and operational handoffs between HR operations and benefits administration teams. The program focused on embedding SAP HCM Benefits into John Deere HR operations, standardizing benefit configuration and enrollment orchestration to reflect the companys existing benefit processes, and establishing operational controls for ongoing benefits maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Management | HCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Core HR | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Experience | HCM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Learning and Development | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Onboarding | HCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll | HCM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll | HCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance and Goal Management | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System | HCM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Succession and Leadership Planning | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Talent Management | HCM |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time and Attendance | HCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time and Attendance | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Management | HCM |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Scheduling | HCM |
|
2012 | 2012 |
|
ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | Legacy | SAP Vehicle Management System (VMS) | Automotive ERP | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2015 | 2015 |
In 2015, John Deere implemented SAP Vehicle Management System VMS within an Automotive ERP context to centralize vehicle and equipment lifecycle functions. The deployment emphasized a custom-implemented VMS solution supporting order management and equipment inventory processes as core Automotive ERP capabilities.
The implementation consolidated functional domains by absorbing the Inventory team and its responsibilities into the Order Management organization, with the combined group rebranded to Equipment. Technical leadership revised key architecture within the SAP Vehicle Management System VMS, aligning the custom VMS architecture to better support order to equipment fulfillment flows and internal inventory tracking data models.
Operational scope was at the program level, with the Order Management and Equipment teams providing cross-functional support for manufacturing and supply chain workflows tied to vehicle configuration, order capture, and equipment inventory control. The SAP Vehicle Management System VMS served as the application backbone for these Automotive ERP business functions.
Governance and delivery practices included providing technical guidance to the VMS development team, assisting with employee management, and disseminating functional and technical knowledge across the overall program. Team restructuring and architectural revisions were used to consolidate ownership and standardize development and operational patterns for the VMS at John Deere.
|
|
|
|
|
Business Process Management | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dealership Management | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Practice Management | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
AI Development
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
AI infrastructure | AI Development |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
Analytics and BI
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2015 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data Warehouse | Analytics and BI |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Process Mining | Analytics and BI |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
Blockchain
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Blockchain Platform | Blockchain |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
Collaboration
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration | Collaboration |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Content Management | Content Management |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intelligent Document Processing | Content Management |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Web Content Management | Content Management |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Web Content Management | Content Management |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
eCommerce
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
eCommerce Fraud Protection | eCommerce |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shipping Management | eCommerce |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
SCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Supply Chain Management | SCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation Management | SCM |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse Management | SCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
CRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Call Center, Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Analytics | CRM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Support | CRM |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Support | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Support | CRM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data Management Platform | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data Management Platform | CRM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Advertising Platform | CRM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Advertising Platform | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Advertising Platform | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Analytics | CRM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Automation, CRM, Sales Engagement | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tag Management | CRM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
EPM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
EPM | EPM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
ITSM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
IT Service Management | ITSM |
|
2025 | 2025 |
|
PLM and Engineering
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Product Lifecycle Management | PLM and Engineering |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Product Lifecycle Management | PLM and Engineering |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
PPM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Project Portfolio Management | PPM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
Procurement
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Procurement | Procurement |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier Relationship Management | Procurement |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
SPM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Configure Price Quote (CPQ) | SPM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Configure Price Quote (CPQ) | SPM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Performance Management | SPM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
TRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Governance, Risk and Compliance | TRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Governance, Risk and Compliance | TRM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Management | TRM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Management | TRM |
|
2010 | 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Management | TRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
PaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Apps Development | PaaS |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robotic Process Automation | PaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2010 | 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2012 | 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Backup as a Service (BaaS) | IaaS |
|
2014 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Backup as a Service (BaaS) | IaaS |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud Storage | IaaS |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data Warehouse Appliance | IaaS |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Servers, Storage and Networking | IaaS |
|
2012 | 2012 |
|
CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Identity and Access Management (IAM) | CyberSecurity |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) | CyberSecurity |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
IT Decision Makers and Key Stakeholders at John Deere
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
Apps Being Evaluated by John Deere Executives
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||