Salem, 97301, OR,
United States
State of Oregon Technographics
State of Oregon Technographics, Software Purchases, AI and Digital Transformation Initiatives
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by State of Oregon and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 4404 State of Oregon employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that State of Oregon has purchased the following applications: FIS Integrated Payables for AP Automation in 2018, UKG Workforce Central Absence Manager (ex Kronos Workforce Absence Manager) for Absence and Leave Management in 2017, Quadient Neopost IS-280 for Mailing System in 2019 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems State of Oregon is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with FIS Global , Oracle , UKG or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing State of Oregon revenues, which have grown to $1.30 billion in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for State of Oregon intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
State of Oregon Tech Stack and Enterprise Applications
State of Oregon ERP
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIS Global | Legacy | FIS Integrated Payables | AP Automation | ERP | n/a | 2018 | 2018 |
In 2018 the State of Oregon implemented FIS Integrated Payables for AP Automation. The implementation record references a vendor provided PayNetExchange service delivered by FIS AvantGard LLC, which signals deployment of an electronic payment exchange component alongside core payable processing.
FIS Integrated Payables was configured to support accounts payable operational workflows, including invoice capture and validation, payment orchestration, vendor payment execution, and remittance distribution consistent with AP Automation capabilities. The deployment narrative indicates use of an external payment exchange to route electronic payments and manage vendor connectivity, aligning the application with standard accounts payable automation and payment network functions.
Governance and procurement documentation includes a contract line for Multnomah ESD described as Vendor Other Agency Provided Service with FIS AvantGard LLC, effective 1/31/2018 through 12/31/2022 and a recorded value of 7,500. This contract entry demonstrates agency level provisioning of FIS Integrated Payables components for State of Oregon accounts payable operations and provides a discrete procurement footprint for the PayNetExchange service.
|
|
|
|
|
ERP Financial | ERP |
|
2016 | 2022 |
|
State of Oregon HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UKG | Legacy | UKG Workforce Central Absence Manager (ex Kronos Workforce Absence Manager) | Absence and Leave Management | HCM | n/a | 2017 | 2017 |
In 2017, State of Oregon began configuring UKG Workforce Central Absence Manager (ex Kronos Workforce Absence Manager) as its Absence and Leave Management solution. The project emphasis in early 2017 was on realigning business processes and process maps with the Kronos solution, a refocus the program reported as a positive and worthwhile decision, and project governance was adjusted to protect the implementation timeline.
The implementation concentrated on three core product design workstreams, with the Workforce Timekeeper Product Design Document WTK reported 95 percent complete, the Absence Manager PDD WAM at 50 percent complete with FMLA and OFLA specifics being finalized by HR subject matter experts, and the Activities PDD WFA at 25 percent complete. Functional configuration workstreams centered on timekeeper workflows, absence administration including statutory leave workflows such as FMLA/OFLA, and workforce activities configuration, with developers engaging to discuss maintenance-specific requirements.
Integration planning and operational coverage were active components of the program, with ongoing integration meetings and developer workshops scheduled, and Kronos developers planned to be on site in early May to address unique maintenance needs. Stakeholder engagement included HR SMEs and targeted presentations to the Highway Business Leadership Team and Region 3 administration, indicating an operational scope that included timekeepers, HR, maintenance operations, and regional leadership audiences.
Program governance and staffing were adjusted during the period, with James Lynch transitioning into the project manager role previously held by John Cossu and Chuck Larsen, bringing contractor PM experience and prior Kronos implementation exposure. Program cadence was managed around a concentrated documentation effort, as three critical product design documents were due within the same month, creating a focused review and validation workload to keep the project timeline steady.
|
|
|
|
|
Absence and Leave Management | HCM |
|
2021 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Administration | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Management | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Core HR | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Core HR | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Learning and Development | HCM |
|
2019 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offboarding | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Onboarding | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll | HCM |
|
2021 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance and Goal Management | HCM |
|
2017 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System | HCM |
|
2015 | 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time and Attendance | HCM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Time and Attendance | HCM |
|
2021 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Video Interviewing | HCM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Management | HCM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
State of Oregon ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadient | Legacy | Quadient Neopost IS-280 | Mailing System | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2019 | 2019 |
In 2019, State of Oregon deployed Quadient Neopost IS-280 as a Mailing System to support Department of Corrections inbound and outbound mail operations for employees and Adults in Custody. The implementation centered on routine postage metering and physical mail handling, with staff trained on the Quadient Neopost IS-280 device to process incoming mail, inspect items for suspicious markings, and prepare outbound postage for DOC correspondence.
Configuration emphasized mailroom workflows and label production, including printing UPS labels for payroll distribution and logging those labels into a centralized digital folder before sending copies to the requesting payroll technician. Operational capabilities implemented with the Mailing System included signature capture for employee check distribution, ID verification, package logging, and point of contact support for in person interviews and meetings.
Operational integrations were limited to carrier and delivery handling documented in operational notes, with regular receipt, logging, and re routing of packages from UPS, FedEx, OfficeMax and DAS Shuttle to the correct internal destinations. The deployment supported adjacent business functions such as payroll fulfillment, public information responses about Adults in Custody, vendor delivery coordination, and reception phone handling without specifying external software integrations beyond documented digital folder logging.
Governance and workflow changes established clear chain of custody and routing procedures for physical mail and packages, a practice for updating and maintaining internal phone lists, and a process for recording hotel reservation confirmations and forwarding them to supervisory records. Day to day operational responsibilities were formalized around the Mailing System procedures, with staff performing multiple front line functions including multi line call handling and routing to the appropriate department.
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services Automation | ERP Services and Operations |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
State of Oregon Analytics and BI
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2015 | 2016 |
|
State of Oregon Collaboration
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration | Collaboration |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
State of Oregon Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Content Management | Content Management |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
State of Oregon CRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Citizen Engagement | CRM |
|
2012 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Support | CRM |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
State of Oregon ITSM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
IT Service Management | ITSM |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
State of Oregon PLM and Engineering
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information System | PLM and Engineering |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
State of Oregon IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2002 | 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Archive as a Service (AaaS) | IaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2002 | 2002 |
|
State of Oregon CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) | CyberSecurity |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
IT Decision Makers and Key Stakeholders at State of Oregon
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
Apps Being Evaluated by State of Oregon Executives
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||