AI Buyer Insights:

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

List of BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
Frankie4 Australia Retail 100 $30M Australia BrandShield BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Threat Modeling 2025 n/a
In 2025, Frankie4 Australia deployed BrandShield Digital Risk Protection to protect its marketing and e-commerce presence in Australia. The BrandShield Digital Risk Protection implementation aligns to the Threat Modeling category and focused on online brand protection and ad monitoring for consumer retail channels. The deployment used BrandShield Digital Risk Protection modules for online brand protection and ad and social monitoring, combining continuous web and social scanning with takedown orchestration for scam websites, phishing pages, and fraudulent social ads. Implementation included centralized monitoring and case management capabilities, automated detection rules, and coordinated takedown workflows to accelerate removal actions. Operational scope covered Frankie4s marketing and e-commerce functions across Australia, with the platform feeding detection alerts into fraud prevention and customer support workflows. Governance was adjusted to include takedown escalation procedures, incident logging for fraud cases, and cross functional reporting between marketing and support teams. Outcomes reported by the vendor include a 97.5% scam website takedown rate and 100% removal of fraudulent ads, and the engagement delivered measurable reductions in customer fraud and support cases. Frankie4 Australia BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Threat Modeling for marketing and e-commerce establishes a continuous monitoring to takedown capability for retail brand protection.
La Vie en Rose Retail 4600 $600M Canada BrandShield BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Threat Modeling 2024 n/a
In 2024, La Vie en Rose deployed BrandShield Digital Risk Protection to protect its retail, e-commerce, and marketing channels across Canada, using Threat Modeling capabilities to detect and act on external brand threats. BrandShield Digital Risk Protection was positioned to monitor and surface instances of fake ads, fraudulent websites, and unauthorized marketplace listings encountered by the brand online. The implementation emphasized digital risk protection covering fake ads, marketplaces, and online impersonation, with configuration aligned to continuous monitoring and automated alerting for suspected abuse. Configurations included detection workflows for fraudulent creative and listing content, prioritization rules for takedown actions, and escalation paths into internal brand protection processes. Operational coverage spanned marketing and e-commerce teams and extended to centralized brand protection oversight across Canadian retail operations, with orchestration of takedown workflows and coordinated communication between monitoring and customer-facing teams. The deployment relied on platform-driven detection and notice-and-takedown procedures to remove impersonating assets and unauthorized marketplace listings. Reported outcomes include a 100% takedown rate for fake ads, restored customer trust, and reduced fraud-related complaints as noted in the case summary. The narrative reflects an implementation focused on Threat Modeling for online brand protection, with emphasis on detection, prioritized remediation, and governance of takedown workflows using BrandShield Digital Risk Protection.
Pop-A-Lock Advertising Fund Professional Services 10 $1M United States BrandShield BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Threat Modeling 2025 n/a
In 2025, Pop-A-Lock Advertising Fund implemented BrandShield Digital Risk Protection in the Threat Modeling category to combat AI-powered impersonation, phishing and fraudulent websites across North America, covering the United States and Canada. The deployment focused on customer-facing brand protection for marketing and customer service, prioritizing detection, validation and remediation of externally visible abuse that threatened customer trust. The implementation leveraged BrandShield Digital Risk Protection capabilities with continuous monitoring for impersonation signals, dedicated threat hunting and enforcement management to drive takedowns and faster remediation. Functional configuration emphasized automated detection pipelines that escalate analyst-validated alerts, enforcement orchestration to remove fraudulent domains and listings, and incident alerting routed to Pop-A-Lock marketing and customer service teams. Workflows combined automated signal collection with human triage by BrandShield threat hunters and enforcement managers to ensure prioritized remediation actions. Operational scope centered on marketing and customer service across the US and Canada, with governance defined around escalation from BrandShield analysts to enforcement managers and Pop-A-Lock stakeholders for coordinated takedown and customer protection workflows. Processes were restructured to channel verified abuse incidents into enforcement and remediation paths, improving coordination between BrandShield and internal teams. Pop-A-Lock used BrandShield Digital Risk Protection to reduce fraudulent incidents and protect customers.
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating BrandShield Digital Risk Protection

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating BrandShield Digital Risk Protection. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities.

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD BrandShield Digital Risk Protection Coverage

BrandShield Digital Risk Protection is a Threat Modeling solution from BrandShield.

Companies worldwide use BrandShield Digital Risk Protection, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as La Vie en Rose, Frankie4 Australia and Pop-A-Lock Advertising Fund are recorded users of BrandShield Digital Risk Protection for Threat Modeling.

Companies using BrandShield Digital Risk Protection are most concentrated in Retail and Professional Services, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using BrandShield Digital Risk Protection are most concentrated in Canada, Australia and United States, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of BrandShield Digital Risk Protection across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using BrandShield Digital Risk Protection range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 66.67%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 0%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 33.33%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 0%.

Customers of BrandShield Digital Risk Protection include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified BrandShield Digital Risk Protection customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Threat Modeling.