AI Buyer Insights:

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

List of IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight Insight Source
BWSC Construction and Real Estate 708 $188M Denmark IFS IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Business Process Management 2008 n/a In 2008, BWSC implemented IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) as part of its IFS platform deployment. The implementation targeted Business Process Management to standardize ERP-driven processes across project execution, financial posting and follow-up. IFS Workflow was configured to digitalize order to payment, posting and follow-up workflows, applying workflow orchestration, approval routing and process automation to project and finance transactions. Configuration emphasized alignment with ERP project structures and transaction posting rules to enforce consistent process steps and control points. The deployment integrated with document management and material management processes to centralize document capture, link documentation to project transactions and coordinate material requisition with project schedules. Operational coverage included project delivery teams, finance and procurement functions within BWSC operations in Denmark. Governance and process changes introduced standardized process ownership, approval hierarchies and follow-up routines to support operational control. Outcomes reported in the case context included more standardized, efficient project execution and better operational control following the IFS Workflow Business Process Management implementation.
Moreld Norway Oil, Gas and Chemicals 2500 $1.0B Norway IFS IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Business Process Management 2009 n/a In 2009, Moreld Norway implemented IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) to standardize project execution and improve traceability between procurement and project activities. The deployment used IFS Workflow as the Business Process Management backbone to increase workflow efficiency and to support faster project and risk management across project lifecycles. The IFS Workflow implementation emphasized workflow orchestration, automated task routing, approval workflows and audit-ready process steps. Configuration work centered on project-centric process templates and role-based routing for procurement and project approvals, enabling consistent process execution and traceable handoffs between functional teams. Operational coverage included project management, procurement and risk management functions within Moreld Apply in Norway and was applied across the group where comparable project practices exist. The workflow capability was linked to IFS project and procurement records to provide process-level visibility and to synchronize task state with core project and purchasing data. Governance was enforced through standardized process definitions, centralized audit trails and role-based approvals, with rollout organized around project phases to embed consistent execution practices. The Moreld case study reports improved workflow efficiency and faster project and risk management resulting from the IFS Workflow implementation.
NextEra Energy Utilities 16800 $24.8B United States IFS IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Business Process Management 2019 n/a In 2019, NextEra Energy implemented IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) as part of its Business Process Management tooling for land and reserves data operations. The deployment at NextEra Energy, coordinated from Houston, TX, was applied to oil and gas reserves related data change projects and lease administration work managed by the Business Analyst and Lease Analyst functions. Configuration emphasized workflow automation for data change requests, task routing and approvals, document routing and traceability, and audit trail capabilities consistent with Business Process Management practice. The IFS Workflow implementation was used to standardize case handling for leases and contracts, to enforce review and approval checkpoints, and to instrument repeatable processes for monthly land reporting and SEC filing preparation. The IFS Workflow environment was integrated into an operational stack that included Quorum and Excalibur, with explicit data conversion workstreams moving records from Excalibur to Quorum and from DocVue to Documentum. Thought Trace AI was implemented across land documents and the IFS Workflow was used to orchestrate the intake, review, and exception handling of AI extracted metadata, supporting acquisitions and divestitures by managing incoming land system data feed processes. Governance and rollout relied on a team based work dynamic and Six Sigma methodologies to identify process improvements and to drive consistent data change controls. NextEra Energy designated subject matter experts and trainers for IFS Workflow and adjacent systems, embedding process ownership into lease administration and special projects teams, and the Thought Trace AI deployment produced explicitly stated gains in efficiency and accuracy of document data interpretation.
Utilities 750 $371M Sweden IFS IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Business Process Management 2021 n/a
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow)

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow). Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities.

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) Coverage

IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) is a Business Process Management solution from IFS.

Companies worldwide use IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow), from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as NextEra Energy, Moreld Norway, Stockholm Exergi and BWSC are recorded users of IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) for Business Process Management.

Companies using IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) are most concentrated in Utilities, Oil, Gas and Chemicals and Construction and Real Estate, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) are most concentrated in United States, Norway and Sweden, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 0%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 50%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 25%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 25%.

Customers of IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified IFS Workflow (formerly P2 Workflow) customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Business Process Management.