List of LexisNexis CourtLink Customers
New York City, 10169, NY,
United States
Since 2010, our global team of researchers has been studying LexisNexis CourtLink customers around the world, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions and perhaps the rise and fall of certain vendors and their products on a quarterly basis.
Each quarter our research team identifies companies that have purchased LexisNexis CourtLink for Legal Practice Management from public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources, including the customer size, industry, location, implementation status, partner involvement, LOB Key Stakeholders and related IT decision-makers contact details.
Companies using LexisNexis CourtLink for Legal Practice Management include: Jackson Lewis, a United States based Professional Services organisation with 1500 employees and revenues of $650.0 million, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein, a United States based Professional Services organisation with 80 employees and revenues of $35.0 million and many others.
Contact us if you need a completed and verified list of companies using LexisNexis CourtLink, including the breakdown by industry (21 Verticals), Geography (Region, Country, State, City), Company Size (Revenue, Employees, Asset) and related IT Decision Makers, Key Stakeholders, business and technology executives responsible for the software purchases.
The LexisNexis CourtLink customer wins are being incorporated in our Enterprise Applications Buyer Insight and Technographics Customer Database which has over 100 data fields that detail company usage of software systems and their digital transformation initiatives. Apps Run The World wants to become your No. 1 technographic data source!
Apply Filters For Customers
| Logo | Customer | Industry | Empl. | Revenue | Country | Vendor | Application | Category | When | SI | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein | Professional Services | 80 | $35M | United States | LexisNexis | LexisNexis CourtLink | Legal Practice Management | 2015 | n/a |
In 2015, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein implemented LexisNexis CourtLink to support litigation and legal research functions. The deployment targets docket searching and the platform Track/Alerts capability to monitor patent litigation across United States jurisdictions, aligning surveillance with the firm’s practice needs.
LexisNexis CourtLink, classified as Legal Practice Management, is configured for saved docket queries, alert subscriptions, and watchlist monitoring that surface new filings and procedural activity. Operational use is concentrated in litigation teams and legal research staff, who route CourtLink alerts into intake and case strategy workflows to identify matters for proactive client outreach and case planning.
Operational governance formalizes alert triage and outreach responsibilities, with monitoring feeds used to trigger partner review and to inform litigation strategy. The implementation emphasizes continuous docket surveillance within the United States and the connection of CourtLink alerting to internal review and client engagement processes.
|
|
|
Jackson Lewis | Professional Services | 1500 | $650M | United States | LexisNexis | LexisNexis CourtLink | Legal Practice Management | 2022 | TRG Screen |
In 2022 Jackson Lewis integrated LexisNexis CourtLink with TRG Screen's Quest to automate docket and complaint retrieval. The deployment used LexisNexis CourtLink in the Legal Practice Management category to support litigation and legal research workflows, targeting inbound research requests across the United States and accelerating delivery of filings to attorneys and clients.
The implementation centered on automated retrieval and delivery capabilities, using CourtLink APIs to orchestrate scheduled and on‑demand searches, retrieval of docket entries and complaint documents, and automated routing to internal research queues. Configuration work included mapping matter identifiers to Quest intake records and building automated notification and delivery paths aimed at improving reference desk throughput and turnaround for litigation teams.
The technical architecture was API driven, delivered in collaboration with TRG Screen and LexisNexis, with TRG Screen's Quest acting as the orchestration and intake layer that invoked CourtLink APIs to fetch filings. Integration scope was focused on automating the end to end flow from inbound research request to document push to attorneys and clients, reducing manual retrieval steps and centralizing access within Quest for legal researchers.
Governance and process changes formalized automated intake and routing procedures for the reference desk and litigation support groups, with role adjustments to supervise exception handling and quality checks on automated retrievals. Outcomes explicitly stated in the implementation included automated retrievals and improved reference desk efficiency, and faster delivery of filings to attorneys and clients in the United States.
|
Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating LexisNexis CourtLink
Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications
| Logo | Company | Industry | Employees | Revenue | Country | Evaluated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||||