AI Buyer Insights:

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

List of Saviom Professional Services Automation Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
FTI Consulting Professional Services 7900 $3.7B United States Saviom Saviom Professional Services Automation Professional Services Automation 2015 n/a
In 2015, FTI Consulting implemented Saviom Professional Services Automation to schedule and visualize roughly 200 employees in its UK office. Saviom Professional Services Automation within the Professional Services Automation category was applied to provide real-time visibility into allocations and to simplify resource scheduling for consulting teams. The deployment emphasized Saviom's enterprise resource management and resource-scheduling capabilities, configured to represent staff, skills, engagements, and assignment timelines for project-based delivery. Functional modules implemented include resource scheduling, allocation visualization, and utilization reporting, with schedule-driven assignment views and capacity planning used to align bookings to project demand. Operational scope was confined to the UK office and covered approximately 200 consulting staff and resource managers, affecting consulting delivery and resource management functions. Governance shifted toward centralized allocation visibility and an ongoing scheduling cadence for resource managers, and the implementation explicitly delivered real-time allocation visibility and simplified resource scheduling as described in the case study.
Global Wind Service UK Professional Services 98 $24M United Kingdom Saviom Saviom Professional Services Automation Professional Services Automation 2015 n/a
In 2015, Global Wind Service UK deployed Saviom Professional Services Automation to coordinate and schedule a 500+ technician workforce across Europe. The deployment began in the second half of 2015 and focused on centralizing resource allocation for field service operations and project delivery within its European operating footprint. The implementation emphasized Saviom Professional Services Automation capabilities for capacity planning, skills matching, forecasting, and field workforce scheduling, with configuration workstreams for resource calendars, skills matrices, and utilization controls. Functional modules implemented included resource planning and capacity forecasting, and schedule orchestration that aligned technician skills to project requirements. Operational ownership was concentrated in operations and project delivery teams, with rollout activity completing initial scheduling and forecasting use cases by early 2016. Governance changes included formalized capacity review cadences and a centralized resource planning process to support multi-country technician deployment and project staffing decisions. By early 2016 Global Wind Service reported outcomes documented in the Saviom case study, completing approximately 20 percent more projects while using approximately 10 percent fewer technicians. The implementation is an example of Professional Services Automation applied to large scale field workforce scheduling and resource optimization in a services-led industrial environment.
Siemens Manufacturing 312000 $84.5B Germany Saviom Saviom Professional Services Automation Professional Services Automation 2012 n/a
In 2012, Siemens deployed Saviom Professional Services Automation in the Professional Services Automation category to support short to mid term resource forecasting and utilization tracking across multiple countries. The implementation scheduled over 300 resources and established centralized resource planning workflows for project and capacity management. Saviom Professional Services Automation was configured to provide resource planning and resource scheduling capabilities, leveraging enterprise resource management style scheduling and timesheet features for booked versus actual analysis. Implemented functional areas included resource forecasting, utilization tracking, and time capture workflows to align assignment planning with timesheet data. The case study describes operational coverage across multiple countries and resource pools, with scheduling focused on short to mid term horizons, and it does not list external system integrations. The deployment emphasized aligning assignment scheduling with timesheet inputs to provide consistent booked versus actual visibility across project teams. Governance adjustments centered on centralized resource planning and standardized scheduling processes using Saviom Professional Services Automation as the authoritative resource schedule. The documented outcome was improved booked versus actual analysis and consolidated scheduling across the covered sites.
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating Saviom Professional Services Automation

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating Saviom Professional Services Automation. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities.

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found