Adelaide, 5035, SA,
Australia
Australian Rail Track Corporation Technographics
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by Australian Rail Track Corporation and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 1981 Australian Rail Track Corporation employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that Australian Rail Track Corporation has purchased the following applications: TechnologyOne ERP for ERP Financial in 2020, JobAdder ATS for Applicant Tracking System in 2017, Hitachi Ellipse EAM (formerly ABB Ability Ellipse EAM) for Enterprise Asset Management in 2015 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems Australian Rail Track Corporation is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with TechnologyOne , National Australia Bank , JobAdder or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing Australian Rail Track Corporation revenues, which have grown to $529.0 million in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for Australian Rail Track Corporation intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
ERP Financial Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TechnologyOne | Legacy | TechnologyOne ERP | ERP Financial | ERP Financial Management | n/a | 2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Management | ERP Financial Management |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JobAdder | Legacy | JobAdder ATS | Applicant Tracking System | HCM | n/a | 2017 | 2017 |
|
ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitachi | Legacy | Hitachi Ellipse EAM (formerly ABB Ability Ellipse EAM) | Enterprise Asset Management | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2015 | 2015 |
In 2015, Australian Rail Track Corporation implemented Hitachi Ellipse EAM (formerly ABB Ability Ellipse EAM) as its Enterprise Asset Management platform to support asset governance across a rail network of approximately 8,500 kilometers spanning five states and servicing roughly 430 freight and passenger services. The deployment served as the authoritative asset registry in parallel with an Esri Enterprise GIS mapping platform, creating a need for synchronized spatial and asset workflows between systems.
Prior to a formal integration, ARTC relied on ad hoc scripts to extract data from Ellipse into Excel then use join tables to push that snapshot into GIS, a process that was labor intensive and produced quickly stale data. This workflow prevented spatial representation and analysis of live work orders and defects, and impeded infrastructure planning and maintenance scheduling because stakeholders lacked timely, consistent asset information.
ARTC selected a commercial off the shelf integration solution, implementing Geonexus to provide bi-directional synchronization between Hitachi Ellipse EAM and ArcGIS Enterprise, using productized connectors that encode system specific business logic. The architecture centered on automated, no code connectors with a configuration interface that uses drop down menus and a preview mode, enabling administrators to define feature class level mappings, validate changes before commit, and maintain synchronization without rebuilding scripts for each change. Robust reporting and change tracking were implemented to provide visibility into synchronization processes and auditability for governance.
ARTC evaluated custom code and alternate ETL approaches and documented per feature class setup costs in the order of 20,000 to 40,000 AUD with an initial feature class build estimate exceeding 120,000 AUD, while noting those alternatives could not reliably support synchronization back into Ellipse and risked version lock during upgrades. The chosen Geonexus integration reduced ongoing custom development exposure, automated recurring data flows, and delivered low maintenance bi-directional synchronization and reporting that supports future additions at the feature class level, improving operational alignment between asset management and GIS for maintenance, planning, and field workflows.
|
Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Contract Lifecycle Management | Content Management |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Signing | Content Management |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
CRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2012 | 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2007 | 2007 |
|
CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) | CyberSecurity |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||