AI Buyer Insights:

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

List of ANSYS Twin Builder Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight Insight Source
Alfred Karcher Manufacturing 17000 $3.8B Germany Ansys Inc. ANSYS Twin Builder Digital Twin 2019 n/a In 2019, Alfred Karcher implemented ANSYS Twin Builder to advance Systems Design Simulation for battery pack engineering. ANSYS Twin Builder was used in concert with Ansys Workbench to create a systems-level simulation environment focused on coupled thermal and electrical behavior of a complex battery pack. The engagement centered on producing reduced-order models and orchestration layers to support integrated system validation workflows. Model development began in Ansys Workbench with detailed CFD runs exported as CFX results, followed by automated creation of a Bash script based CFD LTI ROM for thermal validation of the battery. The implementation included coupling 1D system simulation with the CFD ROM inside ANSYS Twin Builder, and implementation of an NTGK Model in Twin Builder using the Fluent PET tool and Excel to encode the described electrical behavior of a single cell. The project also configured a Fluent Component inside ANSYS Twin Builder to enable co simulation of the electrical system with CFD derived thermal models. Architecturally ANSYS Twin Builder functioned as the system integration and orchestration layer linking CFD ROMs, 1D system models, and component level electrical representations. Automation was applied to ROM generation via Bash scripting to accelerate thermal validation cycles, while Excel and the Fluent PET tool were used to parameterize and import cell electrical characteristics into the Twin Builder model. The integration pattern emphasized standardized model interfaces between CFX outputs, Fluent components, and system simulation blocks to enable repeatable simulation exchanges. Governance focused on formalizing co simulation workflows and model handoff procedures between thermal management engineering and systems engineering teams. Process changes included an automated ROM pipeline, defined validation loops between CFD and 1D simulations, and standardized mapping of single cell electrical behavior into system level NTGK Models in ANSYS Twin Builder. These elements established a repeatable, simulation driven engineering workflow for Systems Design Simulation at Alfred Karcher.
Parker Meggitt Aerospace and Defense 9185 $2.5B United Kingdom Ansys Inc. ANSYS Twin Builder Digital Twin 2017 n/a In 2017, Parker Meggitt implemented ANSYS Twin Builder as a core Systems Design Simulation capability to support a rapid redesign of a flight controller, including embedded software. The engagement focused on accelerating concurrent hardware and software development to meet tight safety of flight and certification deadlines. The implementation centered on hardware and software co-simulation, using a SCADE and ANSYS Twin Builder co-simulation approach to enable model-in-the-loop, software-in-the-loop, and closed-loop system testing. ANSYS Twin Builder was configured to host digital models of the controller and plant behavior while exercising generated controller code, allowing iterative control algorithm refinement and validation within a unified Systems Design Simulation environment. Integrations explicitly included SCADE co-simulation to link model-based software artifacts with ANSYS Twin Builder system models, enabling integrated verification across design and software toolchains. Operational coverage stretched across controls engineering, embedded software teams, and certification engineering, with the simulation workflow used to validate safety-critical behaviors prior to hardware integration. Governance and rollout were structured around compressed development milestones, with co-simulation used as the principal verification strategy to support regulatory evidence generation. Using ANSYS Twin Builder, Parker Meggitt hit safety of flight in seven months, and certified the entire product in about a year, demonstrating the role of tightly coupled Systems Design Simulation and SCADE co-simulation in meeting certification timelines.
SLB, formerly ChampionX Professional Services 111000 $36.3B United States Ansys Inc. ANSYS Twin Builder Digital Twin 2018 n/a In 2018, SLB, formerly ChampionX, deployed ANSYS Twin Builder for Systems Design Simulation to establish a simulation-driven system modeling capability for engineering teams. The implementation focused on integrating a reservoir sampling tool into the software environment and on evaluating the Field Oriented Control robustness of a motor through simulation. ANSYS Twin Builder was configured to ingest and orchestrate component level models, supporting the import and co-simulation of a motor model developed in Simulink and a hydraulic system model authored in Modelica. Workflows emphasized model import, signal mapping, parameter variation, control loop testing, and runtime orchestration to replicate control and hydraulic interactions. Modeling of the hydraulic system in Modelica was developed through collaboration between domain specialists and simulation engineers. Integrations included direct model level integration of Simulink artifacts and Modelica models into ANSYS Twin Builder, and connection of a reservoir sampling tool into the simulation environment to bring domain data into test scenarios. The ANSYS Twin Builder deployment was used by systems engineering, controls engineering, and hydraulics teams to validate controller robustness and system behavior. These integrations enabled combined multi domain simulation workflows within the Systems Design Simulation category. Governance centered on shared model repositories, standardized model exchange and verification steps, and collaborative model development between controls and hydraulic specialists. The ANSYS Twin Builder implementation at SLB reinforced model based validation practices for systems engineering.
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating ANSYS Twin Builder

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating ANSYS Twin Builder. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities. Companies Actively Evaluating ANSYS Twin Builder for Digital Twin include:

  1. India.Gov.In, a India based Government organization with 500 Employees
  2. Medtronic, a United States based Healthcare company with 50000 Employees

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD ANSYS Twin Builder Coverage

ANSYS Twin Builder is a Digital Twin solution from Ansys Inc..

Companies worldwide use ANSYS Twin Builder, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as SLB, formerly ChampionX, Alfred Karcher and Parker Meggitt are recorded users of ANSYS Twin Builder for Digital Twin.

Companies using ANSYS Twin Builder are most concentrated in Professional Services, Manufacturing and Aerospace and Defense, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using ANSYS Twin Builder are most concentrated in United States, Germany and United Kingdom, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of ANSYS Twin Builder across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using ANSYS Twin Builder range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 0%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 0%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 33.33%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 66.67%.

Customers of ANSYS Twin Builder include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified ANSYS Twin Builder customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Digital Twin.