University Of Cincinnati Technographics
Discover the latest software purchases and digital transformation initiatives being undertaken by University Of Cincinnati and its business and technology executives. Each quarter our research team identifies on-prem and cloud applications that are being used by the 15000 University Of Cincinnati employees from the public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources.
During our research, we have identified that University Of Cincinnati has purchased the following applications: Benefitfocus Benefitplace for Benefits Administration in 2019, SAP Student Lifecycle Management for Student Information in 2012, SAP BusinessObjects for Analytics and BI in 2013 and the related IT decision-makers and key stakeholders.
Our database provides customer insight and contextual information on which enterprise applications and software systems University Of Cincinnati is running and its propensity to invest more and deepen its relationship with Benefitfocus , SAP , Oracle or identify new suppliers as part of their overall Digital and IT transformation projects to stay competitive, fend off threats from disruptive forces, or comply with internal mandates to improve overall enterprise efficiency.
We have been analyzing University Of Cincinnati revenues, which have grown to $1.56 billion in 2024, plus its IT budget and roadmap, cloud software purchases, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions for University Of Cincinnati intention to invest in emerging technologies such as AI, Machine Learning, IoT, Blockchain, Autonomous Database or in cloud-based ERP, HCM, CRM, EPM, Procurement or Treasury applications.
HCM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benefitfocus | Legacy | Benefitfocus Benefitplace | Benefits Administration | HCM | n/a | 2019 | 2020 |
In 2019, University Of Cincinnati implemented Benefitfocus Benefitplace for Benefits Administration. The engagement was led by a solution architect who led a team of six developers to design and support automated Human Capital Management and Finance processes across the institution.
Benefitfocus Benefitplace was configured to deliver core benefits enrollment, eligibility management, benefit elections processing, carrier data exchanges, and benefits reporting. The implementation emphasized workflow automation for enrollment cycles and eligibility rule enforcement, aligning benefit data models with the university's HCM records.
The deployment architecture was hybrid, integrating Benefitfocus Benefitplace with SuccessFactors Employee Central, EC Payroll, and on-premise S4 Finance to synchronize employee master data, payroll deduction feeds, and financial posting information. Data orchestration focused on scheduled interfaces and transactional exchanges between Employee Central, payroll, benefits enrollment, and the on-premise finance system.
Operational coverage spanned HR, Payroll, and Finance functions supporting approximately 15,000 employees. Governance included cross-functional coordination, development of decision criteria for hiring, leadership of selection committees, and ongoing communication of technical and business issues to all levels of management.
|
|
|
|
|
Core HR | HCM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Core HR | HCM |
|
2013 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll | HCM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll | HCM |
|
2013 | 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System | HCM |
|
2000 | 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiting, Applicant Tracking System | HCM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Management | HCM |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
ERP Services and Operations
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | Oracle PeopleSoft Campus Solutions | SAP Student Lifecycle Management | Student Information | ERP Services and Operations | n/a | 2012 | 2013 |
In 2012, University Of Cincinnati evaluated SAP Student Lifecycle Management as its Student Information solution to address growing operational risk in the incumbent UniverSIS mainframe environment, and to align campus administrative systems with university financials. The assessment positioned SAP Student Lifecycle Management as the strategic Student Information platform and as a successor option to the prior Oracle PeopleSoft Campus Solutions deployment.
The implementation narrative centers on standard Student Information capabilities, including admissions intake, course registration, student records and academic history, and student financial accounts, configured to operate within SAP Student Lifecycle Management. The evaluation explicitly called for contemporary languages and technology to replace mainframe dependencies, and highlighted the SAP Talent Management module as a future pathway for aligning development and skills management with student and staff lifecycle processes, although Talent Management integration was not yet implemented.
Architecturally the initiative emphasized removing UniverSIS from the mainframe stack and implementing a centralized, service-oriented Student Information layer that integrates directly with the university financial system on SAP. The design rationale required interfaces to financial administration and downstream HR learning and talent processes, and favored modern integration patterns to reduce reliance on proprietary SAG tooling and mainframe operational skills.
Governance and rollout planning included a formal needs assessment and a proposal to hire consultants to generate an alternatives report and migration plan, driven by a SAG contract expiration risk and the difficulty of staffing proprietary UniverSIS technology. The assessment explicitly cited risks from single-vendor mainframe dependency and SAG tool support uncertainty, and it presented SAP Student Lifecycle Management as a pathway to remove those risks while improving long-term integration with SAP financials and talent management capabilities.
|
Analytics and BI
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | Legacy | SAP BusinessObjects | Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI | n/a | 2013 | 2013 |
In 2013, University Of Cincinnati implemented SAP BusinessObjects as part of its Analytics and BI tooling and provisioned the application for use via the university website. The deployment placed SAP BusinessObjects into a web-accessible delivery model intended to support campus reporting and centralized business intelligence needs across administrative stakeholders.
The SAP BusinessObjects implementation focused on web-based report delivery, dashboarding, and ad hoc query capabilities consistent with Analytics and BI platforms. Configuration included server-side report scheduling and threaded report services to enable browser-accessible analytics, leveraging SAP BusinessObjects for semantic layer reporting and governed information models.
Operational coverage emphasized university administrative functions delivered through the website, providing a centralized portal for financial and operational reporting and for other campus administrative consumers. Access and distribution workflows were aligned to university IT operations, with role-based access and centralized publishing controls to manage report lifecycle and content governance.
Governance and rollout followed a centralized IT provisioning approach, with campus-wide availability via the university web presence and IT-managed user entitlement processes. Documentation and support were structured to align business users with governed report catalogs, ensuring consistent use of SAP BusinessObjects within the university’s Analytics and BI environment.
|
|
|
|
|
Analytics and BI | Analytics and BI |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
Collaboration
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Audio Video and Web Conferencing | Collaboration |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collaboration | Collaboration |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
Content Management
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Digital Asset Management | Content Management |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Signing | Content Management |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
CRM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
CRM | CRM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Data Platform | CRM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Data Platform | CRM |
|
2022 | 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Experience | CRM |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Donor and Fundraising Management | CRM |
|
2023 | 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Analytics | CRM |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Analytics | CRM |
|
2012 | 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2017 | 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2013 | 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing Automation | CRM |
|
2021 | 2021 |
|
EPM
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
EPM | EPM |
|
2013 | 2014 |
|
PLM and Engineering
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Product Lifecycle Management | PLM and Engineering |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
PaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Apps Development | PaaS |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
IaaS
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2019 | 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2016 | 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Application Hosting and Computing Services | IaaS |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Backup as a Service (BaaS) | IaaS |
|
2018 | 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Delivery Network | IaaS |
|
2011 | 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Database Management | IaaS |
|
1998 | 1998 |
|
CyberSecurity
Vendor |
Previous System |
Application |
Category |
Market |
VAR/SI |
When |
Live |
Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) | CyberSecurity |
|
2020 | 2020 |
|
| First Name | Last Name | Title | Function | Department | Phone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||
| Date | Company | Status | Vendor | Product | Category | Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No data found | ||||||