AI Buyer Insights:

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

List of Sakai LMS Customers

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
22nd Century Technologies Professional Services 6000 $500M United States Sakai Sakai LMS Learning and Development 2017 n/a
In 2017, 22nd Century Technologies deployed Sakai LMS to centralize learning delivery under the Learning and Development category. The Sakai LMS served as the primary learning content management environment used by instructional designers, trainers, and administrators to manage courseware for staff and faculty. Configuration focused on SAKAI CLE capabilities including learning content management, wiki markup pages, testing and assessment engines, rubric driven grading, discussion boards, and survey functionality. The implementation incorporated elearning authored in Adobe Captivate 9, multimedia assets and narration tools, and included a custom Training Registration Schedule page to align course offerings with staff and faculty schedules. The Sakai LMS environment was integrated with enterprise content and operational systems explicitly referenced in project documentation, including SharePoint 2016 and Confluence for document management and course documentation, Explorance Blue for survey administration, the Student Information Repository for grades and enrollment data, and an internal Electronic Request System eForms40 which underwent UAT verification. FortiClient is referenced as part of the technical environment supporting secure access and endpoint connectivity, and administration covered department sites and DLIFLC training programs. Governance and operationalization included defined software administrator and trainer responsibilities, formal QA testing and UAT processes for integrated components, standardized style guides and Quality Matters rubric standards applied to course design, and administrative control over user permissions, libraries, views and course administration in SharePoint 2016 and Sakai LMS.
Trustees Indiana University Education 16000 $2.7B United States Sakai Sakai LMS Learning and Development 2005 n/a
In 2005 Trustees Indiana University implemented Sakai LMS as a founding partner of the Sakai Project, establishing Sakai-based tools for teaching, learning and library integrations in the United States. The deployment positioned Sakai LMS within institutional teaching and research workflows and anchored the universitys adoption of open source learning environments in academic operations. The implementation centered on the Sakai CLE with explicit use of library and e-research integrations, including the Sakaibrary project to integrate licensed library resources. Functional coverage reflects typical Learning and Development platform capabilities, including course management, content delivery, assessment and collaboration modules configured to support faculty teaching and student learning activities. Integrations emphasized embedding licensed library resources into course environments and supporting e-research workflows within the Sakai CLE, aligning library services and academic technology. Operational scope spans Indiana University activity in the United States, with primary business functions impacted including teaching and learning, library services, and research support. Governance and rollout followed an institutional model, coordinating library teams and academic technology groups to configure modules, manage resource integrations and iterate deployments since the mid-2000s. The narrative documents Sakai LMS as an enduring component of Indiana Universitys Learning and Development stack, with library integration via the Sakaibrary project as a distinct implementation signal.
University of Michigan Education 31987 $11.6B United States Sakai Sakai LMS Learning and Development 2005 n/a
In 2005 the University of Michigan began implementing Sakai LMS as its collaborative learning environment. The Sakai LMS deployment, categorized as Learning and Development, targeted teaching, learning and research across campus in the United States and scaled to tens of thousands of active users and thousands of course sites per year. The institution reported use of 60+ Sakai tools and adopted LTI to integrate third party tools, indicating configuration of multiple teaching and collaboration capabilities. Sakai LMS was configured to support core Learning and Development workflows, including communication, assessment, content hosting and course site management across academic programs. Operational scope extended across academic departments and research units, provisioning thousands of course sites annually to faculty, students and researchers. Integrations centered on LTI based connections for third party instructional tools, which suggests an emphasis on interoperable tool integration within the Sakai LMS environment. Rollout began in fall 2005 and scaled campus wide, implying centralized platform administration and tool level configuration policies to manage a large, active user population. The implementation positioned Sakai LMS as the university platform for coordinated teaching, learning and research collaboration across the institution.
Education 16905 $4.2B United Kingdom Sakai Sakai LMS Learning and Development 2007 n/a
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating Sakai LMS

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating Sakai LMS. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities. Companies Actively Evaluating Sakai LMS for Learning and Development include:

  1. United Arab Emirates University, a United Arab Emirates based Education organization with 4500 Employees
  2. MNP Digital, a Canada based Professional Services company with 8676 Employees

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
No data found
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD Sakai LMS Coverage

Sakai LMS is a Learning and Development solution from Sakai.

Companies worldwide use Sakai LMS, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as University of Michigan, University of Oxford, Trustees Indiana University and 22nd Century Technologies are recorded users of Sakai LMS for Learning and Development.

Companies using Sakai LMS are most concentrated in Education and Professional Services, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using Sakai LMS are most concentrated in United States and United Kingdom, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of Sakai LMS across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using Sakai LMS range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 0%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 0%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 25%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 75%.

Customers of Sakai LMS include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified Sakai LMS customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Learning and Development.