AI Buyer Insights:

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

Westpac NZ, an Infosys Finacle customer evaluated nCino Bank OS

Citigroup, a VestmarkONE customer evaluated BlackRock Aladdin Wealth

Cantor Fitzgerald, a Kyriba Treasury customer evaluated GTreasury

Michelin, an e2open customer evaluated Oracle Transportation Management

Moog, an UKG AutoTime customer evaluated Workday Time and Attendance

Swedbank, a Temenos T24 customer evaluated Oracle Flexcube

Wayfair, a Korber HighJump WMS customer just evaluated Manhattan WMS

List of ANSYS LS-DYNA Customers

loading spinner icon

Apply Filters For Customers

Logo Customer Industry Empl. Revenue Country Vendor Application Category When SI Insight
Arup Professional Services 300 $63M Canada Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2014 n/a
In 2014 Arup deployed ANSYS LS-DYNA as an Explicit Dynamics Solution to support Finite Element Modeling (FEM) and Structural Dynamics analyses focused on assessing and retrofitting Unreinforced Masonry Buildings. The implementation used ANSYS LS-DYNA to execute non linear response history analysis workflows, enabling explicit collapse prediction with non linear finite element models and a probabilistic approach to URM collapse mechanisms. Configuration emphasized non linear finite element modeling, material nonlinearity representation, contact definition, and explicit time integration consistent with explicit dynamics simulation practices. Functional capabilities implemented included Non-linear Response History Analysis NLRHA, probabilistic collapse modeling, and detailed FEM based structural dynamics simulation modules within ANSYS LS-DYNA. The deployment was organized as a multinational multidisciplinary effort, cooperating with 10 AT+R Arup teams worldwide including San Francisco, New York, London, Campus, Madrid, Dusseldorf, Milan, Istanbul, Shanghai, and Sydney to align modeling standards and analysis protocols. Operational scope covered structural engineering and seismic assessment teams executing retrofit design and building assessment, with governance formalized through shared model libraries and standardized NLRHA procedures across participating sites.
Audi Automotive 88604 $70.6B Germany Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2017 n/a
In 2017, Audi implemented ANSYS LS-DYNA as an Explicit Dynamics Solution focused on forming simulation within its CAE organization. The initial deployment targeted sheet metal stamping and forming workflows, positioning ANSYS LS-DYNA as the explicit dynamics engine supporting Audi's forming engineering and simulation validation activities. ANSYS LS-DYNA for forming is also used across other OEMs cited in the program, including BMW, Volvo, Honda, Mazda, Nissan, Toyota, and Unipres. The implementation emphasized core explicit solver capabilities in ANSYS LS-DYNA, including nonlinear material modeling for rate dependent behavior, contact and tooling interaction handling, remeshing and element erosion strategies, and batch automation for iterative forming studies. Configuration work focused on standardizing forming process templates, material property libraries, and solver parameter sets to support reproducible simulation runs and design iteration. Integration work centered on fitting ANSYS LS-DYNA into Audi's CAE toolchain through CAD geometry import, mesh preprocessing workflows, and job submission to centralized compute resources and engineering clusters. Operational coverage included stamping and forming engineering groups, CAE analysts responsible for validation, and close handoffs to design and manufacturing engineering for tooling and process readiness. Governance introduced standardized model governance, material data management, version control for simulation input decks, and validation protocols to align forming signoff gates with engineering release processes. Training and process embedding were prioritized to ensure ANSYS LS-DYNA became part of routine simulation signoff within Audi's forming and stamping programs.
Autoliv Automotive 62567 $10.5B Sweden Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2000 n/a
In 2000 Autoliv implemented ANSYS LS-DYNA as its Explicit Dynamics Solution for high strain rate fabric flow analysis and model integration. The deployment centered on embedding a custom fabric leakage model into the ANSYS LS-DYNA solver to support simulation of massflow through textile structures under dynamic strain. Autoliv developed a new model that calculates massflow through fabric as a function of fabric strain, with each fabric characterized by a set of material constants. The approach applies the St. Venant Wantzel equation for flow through nozzles and diffusors and distinguishes subsonic and critical flow regimes. The effective flow area in the model is decomposed into a pressure dependent component and a strain dependent component, and the formulation accounts for the angle between warp and weft yarns. The fabric leakage capability was implemented in LS-DYNA by Dynamore LSTC, integrating the constitutive extension into explicit dynamics workflows. Implementation work included parameterizing material constants per fabric and coupling structural strain fields to the massflow calculation, aligning with Explicit Dynamics Solution practices such as transient explicit integration and contact aware material response. Operationally the ANSYS LS-DYNA implementation supports Autoliv simulation teams by embedding fabric specific constants and flow equations into standard CAE workflows, enabling consistent model reuse and validation across projects. Governance efforts focused on model parameterization and verification procedures for each fabric type, ensuring the ANSYS LS-DYNA instance produced repeatable results for engineering analysis.
BASF Japan Oil, Gas and Chemicals 920 $452M Japan Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2007 n/a
In 2007, BASF Japan implemented ANSYS LS-DYNA. The deployment targeted Material Simulation for structural analysis in automotive applications and positioned ANSYS LS-DYNA as a core engineering simulation tool within BASF Japan. The ANSYS LS-DYNA implementation focused on explicit dynamic simulation capabilities, nonlinear material models, and advanced contact algorithms typical of Material Simulation use cases. Configurations emphasized crash and impact modeling workflows, detailed meshing and element technology for thin shell and solid structures, and use of material constitutive models for metals and polymers to support structural validation. Operationally the program ran inside engineering and R&D functions, with simulation workstreams supporting product development for automotive customers. ANSYS LS-DYNA was used alongside Abaqus in a comparative simulation environment, enabling model exchange and cross validation between the two solvers for structural analysis tasks. Governance established simulation standards and verification protocols to standardize inputs and review gates across projects, aligning analyst practices for model setup, boundary conditions, and reporting. The narrative links BASF Japan, ANSYS LS-DYNA, Material Simulation, to the business function of structural analysis for automotive applications.
BENTELER International AG Germany Automotive 26000 $8.0B Germany Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2010 n/a
In 2010, BENTELER International AG implemented ANSYS LS-DYNA for Material Simulation within its CAE crash management organization. The deployment was centered on simulation-led development for crashworthiness, enabling CAE Engineers to design, analyze and optimize front and rear bumper systems to meet regulatory and OEM requirements. ANSYS LS-DYNA was used to run explicit dynamics simulations, nonlinear material modeling, contact definitions and large deformation analysis typical of Material Simulation workflows. The implementation supported model setup, high-quality meshing, load case definition for regulatory scenarios and iterative design optimization with emphasis on aluminium bumper system behavior under impact. The implementation operated inside Crash Management System Development and was applied across more than 10 global projects, accounting for over 20 bumper system designs where engineers held design responsibility. Practitioners used ANSYS LS-DYNA alongside complementary tools noted in project records, including LS-DYNA, Hyperctash and PAM Crash, to validate models and produce regulatory evidence. Operational governance emphasized standardized CAE workflows and simulation templates to ensure consistent reporting and repeatable analysis across engineering teams. Configuration of simulation inputs and validation checkpoints was embedded in the development process to align engineering outputs with OEM specifications and regulatory regimes.
Automotive 157457 $165.8B Germany Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2015 n/a
Automotive 1000 $200M United States Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2018 n/a
Professional Services 50 $5M India Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2016 n/a
Manufacturing 40 $5M United States Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2017 n/a
Oil, Gas and Chemicals 36000 $43.0B United States Ansys Inc. ANSYS LS-DYNA Material Simulation 2002 n/a
Showing 1 to 10 of 41 entries

Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating ANSYS LS-DYNA

ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating ANSYS LS-DYNA. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities. Companies Actively Evaluating ANSYS LS-DYNA for Material Simulation include:

  1. Greene County Public Schools, a United States based Education organization with 500 Employees
  2. ACS Group, a United States based Professional Services company with 3000 Employees
  3. AMBOSS, a Germany based Healthcare organization with 10 Employees

Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications

Logo Company Industry Employees Revenue Country Evaluated
Greene County Public Schools Education 500 $140M United States 2026-02-26
ACS Group Professional Services 3000 $750M United States 2025-11-27
Bessemer Venture Partners Banking and Financial Services 430 $230M United States 2025-09-07
Healthcare 10 $1M Germany 2025-08-20
Utilities 76800 $34.9B United States 2025-06-30
Retail 10 $1M United States 2025-06-23
Banking And Financial Services 250 $100M United States 2025-04-22
Education 500 $60M Germany 2025-02-03
Manufacturing 1500 $33M Taiwan 2024-12-24
Aerospace and Defense 1850 $450M Jordan 2024-12-09
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD ANSYS LS-DYNA Coverage

ANSYS LS-DYNA is a Material Simulation solution from Ansys Inc..

Companies worldwide use ANSYS LS-DYNA, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.

Organizations such as Toyota Motor North America, Samsung Electronics, General Motors, Mercedes Benz and BMW are recorded users of ANSYS LS-DYNA for Material Simulation.

Companies using ANSYS LS-DYNA are most concentrated in Automotive and Manufacturing, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.

Companies using ANSYS LS-DYNA are most concentrated in United States, South Korea and Germany, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of ANSYS LS-DYNA across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Companies using ANSYS LS-DYNA range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 17.07%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 7.32%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 21.95%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 53.66%.

Customers of ANSYS LS-DYNA include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.

Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified ANSYS LS-DYNA customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Material Simulation.