List of ThreatModeler Customers
ThreatModeler Software
1 Evertrust Plaza Suite 802,
Jersey City, 7302, NJ,
United States
Jersey City, 7302, NJ,
United States
1 201-266-0510
Professional Services
100
$10M
Since 2010, our global team of researchers has been studying ThreatModeler customers around the world, aggregating massive amounts of data points that form the basis of our forecast assumptions and perhaps the rise and fall of certain vendors and their products on a quarterly basis.
Each quarter our research team identifies companies that have purchased ThreatModeler for Threat Modeling from public (Press Releases, Customer References, Testimonials, Case Studies and Success Stories) and proprietary sources, including the customer size, industry, location, implementation status, partner involvement, LOB Key Stakeholders and related IT decision-makers contact details.
Companies using ThreatModeler for Threat Modeling include: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, a United States based Government organisation with 308814 employees and revenues of $441.30 billion, McKesson, a United States based Professional Services organisation with 45000 employees and revenues of $400.00 billion, CVS Health, a United States based Healthcare organisation with 219000 employees and revenues of $372.81 billion, Costco, a United States based Retail organisation with 333000 employees and revenues of $254.45 billion, Cigna Healthcare, a United States based Insurance organisation with 71295 employees and revenues of $244.38 billion and many others.
Contact us if you need a completed and verified list of companies using ThreatModeler, including the breakdown by industry (21 Verticals), Geography (Region, Country, State, City), Company Size (Revenue, Employees, Asset) and related IT Decision Makers, Key Stakeholders, business and technology executives responsible for the software purchases.
The ThreatModeler customer wins are being incorporated in our Enterprise Applications Buyer Insight and Technographics Customer Database which has over 100 data fields that detail company usage of software systems and their digital transformation initiatives. Apps Run The World wants to become your No. 1 technographic data source!
Apply Filters For Customers
| Logo | Customer | Industry | Empl. | Revenue | Country | Vendor | Application | Category | When | SI | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Adidas | Retail | 46045 | $27.8B | Germany | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2020 | n/a |
In 2020 Adidas deployed ThreatModeler to support Threat Modeling activities on their public website. The implementation centers on ThreatModeler as the primary threat modeling application for web-facing application security analysis, with models authored and maintained for site-level architecture and data flows.
ThreatModeler was configured to capture application topology, data flow diagrams, threat libraries, and risk scoring workflows consistent with Threat Modeling best practices. The deployment included model templates and automated threat enumeration capabilities to formalize threat identification and to standardize model artifacts across engineering teams.
Operational coverage focused on application security and engineering teams responsible for the website, with the Threat Modeling implementation positioned to integrate into development and operations toolchains. Governance and process changes emphasized instituting repeatable threat review workflows and embedding threat modeling steps into the software development lifecycle, aligning product, security, and engineering responsibilities around documented models.
|
 |
Aetna Inc | Insurance | 50000 | $105.6B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2020 | n/a |
In 2020, Aetna Inc deployed ThreatModeler to support Threat Modeling. The deployment is provisioned on a dedicated ThreatModeler tenant accessible at aetna.threatmodeler.net and is used to model web facing assets including the company website.
The implementation centers on core ThreatModeler capabilities, including visual threat modeling, data flow diagram creation, automated threat enumeration aligned to common threat taxonomies, and a central model repository for application inventory and threat artifacts. Configuration included role based access controls, templated model patterns for web application architectures, and policy driven model validation to enforce modeling standards.
Operational ownership spans security architecture, application security, and engineering teams, who use ThreatModeler to instrument threat modeling earlier in the SDLC and to produce standardized model artifacts for development and security reviews. The ThreatModeler instance is reachable via the tenant URL and models are scoped to Aetna web properties to provide consistent threat artifacts across web applications.
Governance was organized around model review workflows, role assignments for architects and security engineers, and artifact handoff into security testing and remediation processes. The deployment emphasizes repeatable model creation, centralized threat documentation, and audit ready model records to support application security governance.
|
 |
Arthrex | Life Sciences | 7500 | $3.2B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2021 | n/a |
In 2021, Arthrex implemented ThreatModeler as a Threat Modeling application. The deployment is provisioned as a web accessible ThreatModeler instance at http://arthrex-poc.threatmodeler.net and is used on their website to model web facing assets. This establishes a centralized model repository for application level threat analysis and documentation.
The ThreatModeler implementation applies core Threat Modeling capabilities including structured data flow diagram creation, attack surface mapping, threat library driven enumeration, automated model analysis, and mitigation tracking. Configurations emphasize model based workflows and collaborative review to support iterative design and security validation. ThreatModeler is used to generate repeatable threat models and artifacts aligned with application security review processes.
Operational coverage centers on security engineering and application development teams, with model outputs consumed in risk review and secure development lifecycle workflows. Governance is organized around centralized model ownership and collaborative signoff procedures for web application designs. The rollout is scoped to Arthrex web properties and the public facing site footprint.
|
 |
Bank Danamon | Banking and Financial Services | 22794 | $1.1B | Indonesia | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2019 | n/a |
In 2019, Bank Danamon deployed ThreatModeler on their website to introduce centralized, web-accessible threat modeling capabilities. This implementation is explicitly categorized as Threat Modeling and is oriented toward architecture-level security for the bank's online channels.
ThreatModeler was provisioned to support model-driven threat identification, data flow diagram management, and a centralized threat repository, capabilities aligned with the Threat Modeling category. The publicly reachable instance at danamon.threatmodeler.net indicates a web-hosted architecture that presents threat models and reports to authorized stakeholders.
Operational coverage centers on web application and online banking architecture, with ThreatModeler outputs positioned for use by application security, architecture, and development teams to inform secure design and remediation workflows. The site-based deployment enables centralized access to models and review workflows, supporting coordinated model ownership and stakeholder review across relevant technology teams.
|
 |
Best Buy | Retail | 85000 | $41.5B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2011 | n/a |
In 2011 Best Buy implemented ThreatModeler to support Threat Modeling across internal and external applications. The deployment targeted web, web services and Flash applications and was managed from Best Buy operations with a Team Lead in Richfield, MN between October 2011 and March 2015, aligning with Best Buy security standards.
ThreatModeler was used to drive security design review workflows, structured threat modeling sessions, validation and verification, and consolidated vulnerability reporting. The implementation covered both manual and automated assessment activities and integrated security code review and design review into the Threat Modeling lifecycle.
The ThreatModeler implementation operated alongside Fortify 360 for security code review, IBM AppScan for web application testing, Microsoft SDL tooling for security design review, and Fortify SSC and Fortify 360 Audit Workbench for scan and findings management. Operational toolchain links included Jenkins for build orchestration, JIRA for issue tracking and SharePoint for project trackers and trending analysis, enabling Threat Modeling outputs to feed remediation workflows.
Governance and process workstreams included maintaining SharePoint issue trackers and project trackers, defining assessment timelines, escalating findings to appropriate management and delivering periodic status reports. The program included retesting and post production support, coordination between onshore development teams and offshore testing teams, and security training for new hires and development teams to operationalize Threat Modeling practices.
|
 |
|
Professional Services | 22600 | $24.2B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2020 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
Banking and Financial Services | 14600 | $6.9B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2017 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
Utilities | 2300 | $400M | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2023 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
Banking and Financial Services | 9000 | $8.0B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2020 | n/a |
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing | 53000 | $22.1B | United States | ThreatModeler | ThreatModeler | Threat Modeling | 2020 | n/a |
|
Showing 1 to 10 of 53 entries
Buyer Intent: Companies Evaluating ThreatModeler
ARTW Buyer Intent uncovers actionable customer signals, identifying software buyers actively evaluating ThreatModeler. Gain ongoing access to real-time prospects and uncover hidden opportunities. Companies Actively Evaluating ThreatModeler for Threat Modeling include:
- Rishabh Software, a India based Professional Services organization with 1000 Employees
- ING Belgium, a Belgium based Insurance company with 5500 Employees
Discover Software Buyers actively Evaluating Enterprise Applications
| Logo | Company | Industry | Employees | Revenue | Country | Evaluated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Rishabh Software | Professional Services | 1000 | $250M | India | 2025-06-09 |
 |
ING Belgium | Insurance | 5500 | $1.8B | Belgium | 2024-07-02 |
FAQ - APPS RUN THE WORLD ThreatModeler Coverage
ThreatModeler is a Threat Modeling solution from ThreatModeler.
Companies worldwide use ThreatModeler, from small firms to large enterprises across 21+ industries.
Organizations such as U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, McKesson, CVS Health, Costco and Cigna Healthcare are recorded users of
ThreatModeler for Threat Modeling.
Companies using ThreatModeler are most concentrated in Government, Professional Services and Healthcare, with adoption spanning over 21 industries.
Companies using ThreatModeler are most concentrated in United States, with adoption tracked across 195 countries worldwide. This global distribution highlights the popularity of ThreatModeler across Americas, EMEA, and APAC.
Companies using ThreatModeler range from small businesses with 0-100 employees - 1.89%, to mid-sized firms with 101-1,000 employees - 7.55%, large organizations with 1,001-10,000 employees - 20.75%, and global enterprises with 10,000+ employees - 69.81%.
Customers of ThreatModeler include firms across all revenue levels — from $0-100M, to $101M-$1B, $1B-$10B, and $10B+ global corporations.
Contact APPS RUN THE WORLD to access the full verified ThreatModeler customer database with detailed Firmographics such as industry, geography, revenue, and employee breakdowns as well as key decision makers in charge of Threat Modeling.